After reading so many articles and hearing so many reports
about how dangerous tanning is, I have decided to revisit what happens when a
person goes to a tanning salon. There seems to be a lot of misconceptions about
what goes on. So let’s review what the process is, and go over a few other
things I have learned since tanning, researching, and starting this blog.
First, a new client will fill out a survey to help the staff
at the salon determine what that person’s skin type is. The fairest skin type,
skin type 1, would be directed to spray tanning as an option, but no sunbed. Skin
type 1 does not tan and they would get no benefit from a sunbed. This is
standard practice in North America, and it is good business. Nothing would be
accomplished if they let a skin type 1 person tan because burning clients is a
guaranteed path to driving away business.
Skin type 2 is tricky. That is my skin type. The survey I
took put me at the lowest part of the skin type 2 range so I had to move
forward slowly and conservatively. The higher range of skin type 2 is not quite
as delicate, but still needs a close eye on how the skin reacts to UV exposure.
For me, I worked with the staff to set a schedule of only 3 minutes in the
sunbed, waiting 48 hours between visits. I was in a level one sunbed (UVA and UVB rays) that had a
maximum time of 20 minutes for any skin type. Someone who has not tanned regularly, with
sensitivity to sun exposure like me, would need to start out very gradual. Professional salons train their staff to know
how to handle the fairest skin type 2. They know how to handle all skin types,
but a fair skin type 2 would be the one most likely to burn if they did
something wrong. The staff at my salon was very knowledgeable about how to
slowly build the exposure time without burning me. They prepared me for the
results to be unnoticeable for a few weeks. They were right. It seemed to take a very long time for me to
see any tan lines. I still do not see a major difference between my tan skin
and my untanned skin. Skin type 3 and 4 do not burn as easily and have a little more wiggle room on tanning schedules, but never allowed more than the maximum time limit for the equipment being used.
Sunbeds have a maximum exposure time. There
are beds with maximum exposure time of 10, 15 and 20 minutes so there is an
equation that factors in the max exposure time and person’s skin type that a
trained professional would use to set the customer’s tanning schedule. Starting out in a 20 min max sunbed was
different than it would have been in a 15 min max or a 10 min max for me. That
max time is just that, the most a person could use the equipment per session no
matter who it is, even the skin types that aren’t sensitive and don’t burn
easily. I also know now that tanning beds are only 2-3 times stronger than the
sun, yet it is often reported that they are 10-15 times stronger. That is just one of the many things
misrepresented about tanning, and one of the inspirations for me to start
blogging about my experience.
I have learned that professional salons have their client’s
safety as their top priority. They are careful to follow their safety protocol
to ensure no one gets burned. They stay well below exposure times to keep the
risks of burning low. They stick to the maximum exposure times per bed. Again, it would be
a very bad business plan for a salon to not follow these rules because they
would burn clients and lose business.
I have learned that my ever so slight base tan protects me
from sunburn. I know this because I have successfully spent hours outdoors with
no SPF or 20-25 SPF with no sign of sunburn. That is certainly something I
could never have done before tanning in the salon. Untanned skin burns more
easily than tanned skin, plain and simple. With so many messages out there to
avoid any and all UV, to wear sunscreen constantly, it seems to be working
against nature. We are avoiding the sun, so we have become more sensitive to
the sun. I lived like this for years and I burned anytime I was in the sun for
more than 10 minutes before I built a base tan.
Something that I hear often is the claim that “I burn the first time I’m
in the sun, and then it turns into a tan.” This is a common misconception, one
I believed for years too, but the reality is that the skin burns, then peels to
the underlying skin layer that was not overexposed. What we need to promote and
encourage, is not to burn, ever. We need to take it slow and build the base tan
gradually. The burn turning into a tan is a myth, the base tan protecting us is not a myth.
I now know how prevalent Vitamin D deficiency is and that it
is a very serious problem. I have
learned what Vitamin D does in our bodies to help fight disease and illness. I
understand that it is vital for a healthy lifestyle and that most of Americans
are deficient. Being deficient puts us at risk of over 100 diseases including cancer. Vitamin D deficiency is 50 percent higher now than it was just 15 years
ago and I believe it comes from that constant message to avoid the sun.
I have learned that groups who oppose tanning, like to throw
out numbers to scare the public into believing skin cancer is a major risk
threatening our lives. Like it is somehow more of a threat facing the general
population than it has been in years past. But it is really only a threat to 2 percent of the population. I do not mean to sound callus, skin cancer is a serious issue and I believe it is something to be concerned, and vigilant about. However, it is not as rampant as they make it sound, and the relationship of UV exposure and skin cancer is not as clear cut as they say. They misrepresent studies to support
their views when those studies show that professional salons do not contribute
to the statistics they cite. They overstate the risks and misinform the public.
The truth is that skin cancer is a
minimal risk when compared to the health risks of Vitamin D deficiency. Funny
how doctors will prescribe medications that have severe side effects to treat
an illness because the benefits would outweigh the risk, yet when it comes to
UV exposure it seems the smaller risk of skin cancer wins over the many
benefits of a healthy Vitamin D level.
It is backwards thinking.
I have learned that chemical sunscreen is dangerous when
used constantly. The chemicals are absorbed into our skin and it blocks absorption
of UV needed for Vitamin D. It is a double whammy. We should only need to use
sunscreen when there is a chance we will be in the sun long enough to burn. It should not be used daily.
I have learned that there have been enough stories about
tanning being bad for you and virtually no stories being told about how it can
be beneficial. There are success stories out there, like my experience. That is why I decided to tell the other side of the story. Since sharing my story I have been contacted by many people with similar situations, stories, and experiences. I have heard many people say their doctor suggested tanning, and after hearing my story they have done their own research and made more informed decisions on what would work best for them. I don't believe there is a one size fits all solution and being informed is the best approach no matter what the issue.
The bottom line is, it is all about moderation, and some
people just don’t understand that. There
is a misconception that all tanners are dark, leathery, and old looking. But we
are just normal people in all shapes, sizes, and colors. We just have better
Vitamin D levels than the general population.
On a personal note, while writing this post I realized how much I have learned and I think I may have needed to break this one down because it has gone in so many directions. But I already put the time into it so I am posting it as is. I guess I have learned that I am still very passionate about this subject and that neglecting my blog means I ramble when I get back to writing. So I am re-committing to posting here regularly and hopefully I can scale things back and take on bits and pieces rather than trying to say everything all in one post. Thanks for reading!