I had the opportunity to testify before a State Senate
committee hearing again this week. The bill being proposed is asking to make a
law requiring parental consent for anyone under 18. That consent is to be
renewed every 6 months. While I think it is unnecessary, I am not completely
opposed to the bill. Currently professional salons require consent for anyone
under 18 voluntarily, so really the only major change would be that it is
required by law and the frequency of the consent renewal.
I got word from my salon that there was talk that there
would be an amendment proposed to completely ban anyone under 18 from tanning.
I made sure I would be there to voice my concerns about how a ban would be a
mistake. Sure enough, one of the Senators said she would be introducing an amendment
to ban anyone under the age of 18 from tanning through a professional salon, so
I am glad I went. Well, of course, guess
who is the FIRST person called up to testify. While I am not terribly
comfortable in this kind of setting, I didn’t have a chance to think about it
much since I was the first one to go. I guess that may have worked to my
advantage.
The tanning industry had a few people that testified after
me with some very interesting data. Some of which I have learned while doing my
own research, but I certainly learned some new things as well. For instance,
Melanoma is more common in someone that works indoors than someone with a job
spent outdoors. Seems to me that means that UV exposure ISN’T the black and
white cause of melanoma that the medical industry would like us to believe.
Clearly there are other factors that contribute. Also, there have been surveys
done that show that 3 out of 4 teens that currently tan, with their parent’s
permission, would seek out home units or tan aggressively outdoors if there
were a ban preventing them to go to a salon. Banning teens from the one source
that has extensive safety measures in place, will end up increasing these teen’s
health risks. That isn’t the result these lawmakers want, yet many of them don’t
want to admit that. They are told that all of the increased cancer risks come
exclusively from tanning in professional salons. That isn’t true, home units
are much more dangerous and increase a person’s risk by 40 percent because
there are no limits to how often or how long a person tans, and there is no skin
type assessment to set the limits.
There were Dermatologists testifying again that the bill
doesn’t go far enough and were pushing for the full ban. The Dermatologists
said things that were completely false. Not just skewed, but flat out lies. One
dermatologist said that “no UV is safe” “47% of tanners are addicted” and that
“salons let clients tan daily” None of those statements are true. Another
doctor claimed that sunbeds are 10-15 times more intense than the summer sun at
noon. That is not true as I have written about before; sunbeds are only 2-3
times more intense than the sun and you spend a fraction of the time in a
sunbed to avoid overexposure. I
couldn’t take notes fast enough to get all of the inaccurate statements and
only caught one of their names. Dr. Hunter H Sams, a dermatologist said, “Adequate
amounts of Vitamin D can be derived easily from our diet.” As I have written in
prior blogs, it is impossible to get sufficient amounts of Vitamin D through
diet alone. UV exposure is the most effective and efficient way to get Vitamin
D.
The bill for parental consent passed, but I am very happy to
report that the Senate committee did not approve the amendment to ban anyone
under 18 from tanning in a professional salon. I feel like my voice was heard.
One of the Senators made it clear to me that he agreed that a parent should be
the one to make this decision. Another Senator asked many of the others
testifying about how the science isn’t clear and he seemed to feel they shouldn’t
legislate on something that had this many variables. He understood that salons
have strict safety rules they abide by to keep clients from burning.
All in all, it has been a very interesting experience. I
have never been involved in a process like this and I have learned a great
deal. It has also been an eye opening experience as to what lengths the
opposition will go to, in order to get their way, even if the facts don’t
support their claims. It is amazing to me that there is so much blame placed on
professional salons when they have not contributed to the statistics used
against them.